Better And Better

If you don't draw yours, I won't draw mine.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Liar.*

*The subject of this post has since decided to begin educating himself, and seems to have reversed his general position. Good for you, Dr. Holder! The will to educate one's self about subjects that one finds distasteful shows the soul of a true academic.
__________________________
It is to be presumed that a college president would be educated on that which he speaks, yes?

So, when Kilgore College President Bill Holda states a specific falsehood, openly and directly about an occasion in recent history, we may assume that he is lying.

In this interview (the money quote starts at 01:15), Holda refers to the famous massacre in Luby's in 1991:
"...in the Luby's restaurant and others, where you had multiple shooters, innocent people were killed by other people who had concealed licensed handguns because they weren't sure who was the shooter and who was the defender."

Okay, wait a second: The October 16, 1991 Luby's shooting in Killeen, TX was pivotal in Texas handgun carrying rights history, for the very fact that there was, at that time, no such thing as a legal way for a citizen to carry a handgun for self-defense, if that citizen wasn't one of the Only Ones. In 1995, the State Of Texas responded to that very event by creating the concealed handgun license (CHL). There was ONE shooter, named George Jo Hennard, who cornered a bunch of legally-disarmed people in a crowded restaurant, and murdered them one by one.

This incident motivated Texans like nothing else ever had before, to change over 100 years of law, to permit them to pack a handgun.

I am astonished that Holda does not remember this event, which happened in his state, like it was yesterday. I certainly do. I remember exactly where I was when I heard about it (at work, doing some production art). I remember my rage at the fact that one person could take so many people down without resistance.

Imagine if, yesterday, you had heard an educator tell about how he remembered the I.E.D's going off and killing Kennedy in Dealey Plaza, right before the Migs dropped their redundant-yet deadly load of explosives on the horrified watching crowd. I mean, sure, there's some dispute by some about the method of Kennedy's death, but we can agree that he was shot in the head, and was the only man to die in the plaza that day, 47 years ago.

You would think, "there is NO WAY that a thinking human who was alive at the time could forget these details. He is lying, to push an agenda. Or he's crazy. Either way, he is not trustworthy."

I cannot believe that he was not challenged on this issue by the talking heads.
____
H/T to Tam.

Labels: , , ,

8 Comments:

At Tuesday, November 23, 2010 10:53:00 AM, Blogger J said...

Might want to correct your Wiki link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luby%27s_massacre

Have you written to him to correct his falsehoods? He should not be allowed to make a totally bogus statement like this.

 
At Wednesday, November 24, 2010 11:11:00 AM, Blogger Mulligan said...

I've been in that restaurant and it is sobering to stand there and think of the consequences of peaceful citizen disarmament.

I must disagree with commenter J however.

There is nothing in the 1st Amendment requiring truth or accuracy. While I believe inaccuracies such as this should be challenged and corrected (and perhaps penalized), he has the right (if he is a citizen of the USA) to state whatever garbage he likes.

 
At Wednesday, November 24, 2010 4:04:00 PM, Blogger Old NFO said...

He's an edumacator... he CAN'T be wrong... sigh... and yeah, I'd be writing him and pointing out his gross errors!

 
At Wednesday, November 24, 2010 6:00:00 PM, Blogger Matt G said...

J and Old NFO: Better to write the news station to post the correction. He's a "true believer."

 
At Thursday, November 25, 2010 12:01:00 PM, Blogger Old NFO said...

Good point Matt, a true believer would never recant... sigh...

 
At Sunday, November 28, 2010 9:47:00 AM, Blogger Matt G said...

Mulligan, whatever gave you to believe that I felt that he shouldn't have the right to say these things??!?

I simply wanted it noted carefully that his credibility is shot.

 
At Sunday, November 28, 2010 3:44:00 PM, Blogger Carteach0 said...

There is another, and far more likely, choice.

The man is an idiot.

Given my experience with school administration, I can say it's practically a career requirement.

 
At Sunday, November 28, 2010 10:22:00 PM, Blogger Mulligan said...

ah, sorry Matt. I was responding to J's 'should not be allowed' comment.

I would agree the speaker's credibility is shot with people that know the facts. His credibility is probably still A-OK with the sheeple that he's trying to influence. They're running on emotion and won't bother to verify or remember actual facts.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Add to Technorati Favorites
.