Bloomberg's logic:
Mayor (only mayor? Wait-- that can't be right! I mean, my map of New York City shows that it ends 'way up northeast of here... surely he has more jurisdiction than that...) Michael Bloomberg tells us that the nation's police should go on strike for harsher gun laws.
So let me get this straight: The mayor wants police to refuse to come to work, because they are supposed to believe, like he does, that if a citizen is in trouble, they should call the police, whom he has encouraged to ditch work?
Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-hah no.
I rather liked Hoge's point of view on it: HizHonor's bodyguards are police, right? They should go on strike first.
Labels: guns, polarization, police, Politics, You Do That In Public?
posted by Matt G @ 5:00 PM
5 Comments:
HizDumbass is also neglecting the Taylor Law, which specifically forbids unionized public employees (like police, fire, etc) from striking.
This is your mother. We often disagree. I think Bloomberg is a control nut. I told you so at least two days ago. Unfortunately, he also is an idiot. Thank God we are in Texas.
If the police go on strike, who will prevent evil Tea-Baggers from hanging NYC politicians from lamposts?
( that was hyperbole, BTW. I think ... )
Zer beat me to it, and how he's backing off, saying that's NOT what he really meant... sigh...
My thought was similar to Hoge's, but then I realized that Bloomberg is a rich guy and can just hire his own security. Who presumably would have guns of course.
I agree with your mother. Most liberals are control freaks, and disarming the populace is the first step.
Screw him.
Post a Comment
<< Home